<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Day Jar View &#187; music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dayjarview.com/tag/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dayjarview.com</link>
	<description>I heard commentary and dissent had merged and formed dysentery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 10:32:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Digital silk purse or sow&#8217;s ear?</title>
		<link>http://www.dayjarview.com/2008/10/digital-silk-purse-or-sows-ear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dayjarview.com/2008/10/digital-silk-purse-or-sows-ear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digitise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dayjarview.com/blog/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 1998, when I worked for a company in Harrow that had a US supplier, I once went to a trade show where we were exhibiting some of their products. I&#8217;ll never forget what one of the American guys said to someone regarding digital capture technology, when the discussion came around to how wonderful [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 1998, when I worked for a company in Harrow that had a US supplier, I once went to a trade show where we were exhibiting some of their products.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll never forget what one of the American guys said to someone regarding digital capture technology, when the discussion came around to how wonderful it was. &#8220;When you digitise shit,&#8221; he said matter of factly, &#8220;you don&#8217;t get gold: you get a digital shit.&#8221;</p>
<p>His point, buried in that surprisingly un-American-like comment, was of course that unless the source material is good, digitising it won&#8217;t help &#8211; you&#8217;ll only end up with a more-or-less exact copy that won&#8217;t get any worse.</p>
<p>I was reminded of this the other day when I carted two boxes of CDs down from the loft. My plan is to digitise them all as audio files and then ebay/car boot/charity/sling them accordingly. Having finally made the big decision to get rid of them all, the thing is, I was then faced with an even tougher choice: what format to choose?</p>
<p>I plumped for Windows Media Pro Audio at 192KBps, which means that I am technically sacrificing half of the audio information somewhere. Lost forever, never to be heard again.</p>
<p>Will it matter? Probably not, but the loss of the music data will probably be easier to take than saying goodbye to some of the discs; one of which was my first ever CD single bought in 1990 in HMV Oxford Street &#8211; Adamski&#8217;s Killer.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the price of progress I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dayjarview.com/2008/10/digital-silk-purse-or-sows-ear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

